We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry
Login:
username:

password:

Plattform:

Forgotten password?

Registration

Int J Comput Dent 20 (2017), No. 4     15. Dec. 2017
Int J Comput Dent 20 (2017), No. 4  (15.12.2017)

Page 377-392, PubMed:29292412, Language: English/German


Assessment of residual coronal tooth structure postendodontic cavity preparation using digital dental impressions and micro-computed tomography
Al-Nuaimi, Nassr / Patel, Shanon / Foschi, Federico / Mannocci, Francesco / Austin, Rupert S.
Objectives: To evaluate the in vitro accuracy of digital impressions for three-dimensional (3D) volumetric measurement of residual coronal tooth structure postendodontic cavity preparation, with reference to micro-computed tomography (μCT).
Methods: Quantification of the accuracy and precision of the intraoral digital scanner (3M True Definition Scanner - IOS) was performed using a metrology gauge block and a profilometric calibration model. Thirty-four human extracted molars with endodontic access cavities were scanned using both intraoral scanning (test scanner) in high-resolution mode, and µCT (reference scanner: GE Locus SP μCT scanner) in high- (HiResCT) and low- (LoResCT) resolution modes. Comparisons of volumetric accuracy and 3D profilometric deviations were performed using surface metrology software. One-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), in combination with the Bonferroni post hoc test, was implemented to compare the differences in volume measurements between scanning methods.
Results: Digital scanning revealed smaller volume measurements by 1.36% and 0.68% compared to HiResCT and LoResCT, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the volumetric measurements obtained from the IOS scanner and both HiResCT and LoResCT scans (P < 0.001). Analysis of the mean 3D profilometric deviations revealed that the IOS displayed greater surface deviation (± 27/33 μm) vs HiResCT and LoResCT (± 16/32 μm).
Conclusions: Although volumetric measurements of endodontically accessed teeth were up to 1.36% smaller in comparison to µCT, the digital scanner was able to reliably measure the extra- and intracoronal aspect of the endodontically accessed tooth.

Keywords: intraoral scanner, micro-computed tomography, endodontic cavity preparation, residual coronal tooth structure, volumetric, metrology